Our Site
logo

  News

Archives Archives
Archives News & Sports
Classifieds Classifieds
Editorials Editorials
Editorials Columns
Obituaries Obituaries
AP Videos Video Center

  Top Jobs


  Extras

Blog Traveler Blogs
Com. Blogs Community Blogs
Com. Calendar Community Calendar
Com. Calendar Data Center
Progress Front Page
Gallery Photo Gallery





  Special Sections

Arkalalah Sanderholm
Arkalalah Arkalalah 2007
Arkalalah Arkalalah 2006
Arkalalah Arkalalah 2005
Progress Progress 2007
Progress Progress 2006
Progress Progress 2005

  Sports

ACHS ACHS Sports
Cowley Sports Cowley Sports
Cowley Sports Wichita State Sports
K-State Sports K-State Sports
KU Sports KU Sports
OU Sports OU Sports
OSU Sports OSU Sports

  Site Info

About Us About Us
Archives Advertising
Classifieds Subscribe
-
  USA Weekend



 
Google
WWW arkcity.net
Web posted Monday, January 7, 2008


Casino operators focus on new ground in Kansas

By CARL MANNING
Associated Press Writer

TOPEKA -- When folks think about Kansas, they have the usual images: sprawling wheat fields, graceful pastures and, more times than not, references to Dorothy and the Wizard of Oz.

In the coming months, add to that list slot machines, roulette wheels and money -- lots of money. That lure of riches has casino operators converging on the state like stampeding cattle.

It started with the enactment last year of a law allowing four state-owned and operated resort casinos in Kansas. Thirteen casino operators are jostling for a chance to open casinos in Wyandotte, Cherokee, Sumner and Ford counties.

The operators would manage the casinos for the state in return for a piece of the action -- which translates to money measured in the millions. State-owned casinos are unique to Kansas but that doesn't mean it can't work. Casino operators are betting they will make money; if they didn't believe that, they wouldn't be here.

''It's not going to knock off Las Vegas as the top destination, but people are going to play there. Where people play is where money can be made,'' said David Schwartz, director of the Center for Gaming Research at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

Resort casinos are a competitive business, always on the lookout for ways to expand their market.

''It becomes a situation where they want to expand pre-emptively. The other companies want to expand, so they have to expand just to survive and stay alive. If somebody else goes to Pennsylvania, they would want to go to Kansas,'' Schwartz said.

Beyond the potential market, Kansas has another advantage. Whoever ends up running the four casinos will have a monopoly in their gambling zone. The law says no other casinos can be built until 2032 and the operators sign 15-year management contracts with the state.

''This is going to be very stable profits and that is a chance they want to take. It is a reason for so many to try to get into Kansas,'' Schwartz said. ''If you don't have competitors in the region, it is that much more stable.''

Doug Lawrence, a gambling consultant and lobbyist who helped craft the law, said another incentive is Kansas casinos will pay 22 percent of revenue to the state compared to other states where it can be as high as 40 percent.

''The state finally understood that a higher tax rate doesn't mean more revenue,'' Lawrence said. ''When you build a larger facility, they will come from farther away to see it.''

He said location is another factor. The casinos in Wyandotte, Sumner and Cherokee counties all will be near heavily traveled interstates and Ford County's will be in Dodge City, a well-known tourist spot because of its Old West heritage.

''It's a perfect storm. Great sites, great tax rates and a certainty of circumstances for the next 15 years,'' said Lawrence, who's representing prospective developers in Ford, Sumner and Wyandotte counties.

Casinos may be in the gambling business, but they don't gamble with their money.

''These companies today are extremely sophisticated,'' said Frank Farhenkopf, American Gaming Association president. ''They are responsible to their shareholders for a fair return on investment. They are followed closely by Wall Street analysts and they just don't do things willy-nilly.''

He said casino operators rely on numerous studies and crunch numbers to help them decide whether a location has potential.

For instance, a 2006 survey by Harrah's Entertainment ranked Kansas among the 31 states generating more than 2 million casino trips throughout the nation the previous year. It also said Kansas was among states with casino gambling participation higher than the national average of 25 percent of adults.

Farhenkopf said Kansas, like Iowa, is a state with light industry and agriculture.

''It has worked out for the companies and worked out for the state and local governments there. You would expect it to be similar in Kansas,'' he said.

The AMA's 2007 survey shows $1.2 billion in gross revenues for the 16 facilities in Iowa and $1.6 billion for neighboring Missouri with 11 casinos, including four in Kansas City, Mo., near Wyandotte County.

Casino operators don't want to appear to be parachuting into Kansas and dropping a casino on some open land. They have developed alliances with Kansans, either in partnerships or hiring them as consultants.

Still, the biggest unknown is whether the law creating casino gambling eventually will be upheld by the courts. A lawsuit filed by the attorney general's office argues it isn't and the question ultimately will be decided by the Kansas Supreme Court.

That's hasn't stopped casino operators from spending money for such things as studies, plans, consultants, attorneys and land options. Even if they don't get a contract, they can use those expenses as a tax deduction.

''It is more likely they would make money on it than they wouldn't, whether they get to build a casino or not,'' Schwartz said.

Or to borrow from casino parlance -- in the end, the house always wins.


  Advertisers


  Weather

  Online Forum

Forumn Traveler Talk

  Opinion Poll

Second Amendment
Does the Second Amendment guarantee an individual's right to own a gun, as the Supreme Court recently ruled?

Yes, that was the intent of the founding fathers.
No, the founders were only talking about militias.
It's still unclear.

  Join E-news
Newsletter Signup
The Traveler Online



All Contents ©Copyright The Ark City Traveler
Comments or questions? Contact the webmaster.
Add Arkcity.net to your favorites